Three California Writers:

Majority Report
by Samuel J. Rice

Edited by: Cindy Beck

Back to the ANPA Digital Library homepage
Terms of Use

MAJORITY REPORT

             Your committee in approaching the consideration of this subject were deeply impressed with its importance.  They saw a policy adopted by the Indian commissioners deeply affecting the present and future prosperity of the state.  Regardless of the extraordinary circumstances which impelled the wave of population to this state, they have undertaken to assign to the Indian tribes a considerable portion of the richest of “our mineral land”(?).  Regardless of the topographical character of our state which presents an extensive surface of the most valuable grazing land of our earth, but with comparative limited quantity of land fully adapted to agriculture purposes those gentlemen have undertaken to assign no inconsiderable portion of the latter, including property of the Indian tribes, wholly incapable by habit or taste of appreciating its value.

 

            To take any portion of the country west of the Sierra Nevada for the home of the wild and generally hostile Indians would be so manifestly unwise and impolitic that your committee can not think that anything more is necessary than thus to present it to public consideration.  But the policy which suits California has been one long established and to which we claim an undoubted right.  That policy is to remove all Indian tribes beyond the limits of the state in which they are found, with all practicable dispatch.

 

            Summing up and adopting of the resultions read:

 

            Resolved:  As the sense of the Senate and Assembly of the State of California, that the policy pursued by the Federal government towards the Indian tribes in this state, is wholly and radically wrong and should be rejected.

 

            Resolved, That our Senators in Congress be intrusted to oppose the confirmation of any and all treaties with the Indians of the State of California, granting to Indians an exclusive right to occupy any of the public lands in the state.

 

            Editor’s Note – These are only a few of the resolutions extracted from many more, but they show emphatic influence upon the law-makers in Washington.  Ever since the men of erudition in Washington have eschewed the pleadings of the Indians up to this day.

            The recent statement made by Hon. J. E. Raker before the Congressional committee on Indian Affairs on the hearings, is as follows:

            The impression given out by the assistant commissioner of the Indian Affairs was that the Indian delegates from California, in their plea for their people, had shown themselves ungrateful.  It was shown by the assistant commissioner (without any opportunity on the part of the Indians to explain their position) that they had all been to government schools and that their statements concerning the needs of the California Indians were not fair to the Department of the Interior, and represent gross unappreciation.  It should be remembered that the California Indian delegates were not representing the Indian population of California, and that in the limited time allotted to them to present their case, they were continuously interrupted by questions.  It is a fact that can not be successfully disputed that many of the California Indians have not received educational or other advantages from the Federal government.

            The assistant commissioner in the hearing referred to, under date of March 23, 1920, page 77 said:  “Yes, sir; we feel that the California Indians have not been treated fairly by the government; that they ought to have the opportunity to go the Court of Claims to have that claim tried out with the understanding that if either side is not satisfied with the judgement of the Court of Claims they may appeal to the Supreme Court.”

            This is only an instance whereby the public at large can build or form its intelligent opinion regarding the Indian problem.  To help this cause along is to illuminate the question of Indian problems in a square deal.

 

[Home] | [Bibliography] | [Digital Library]
[Indexes] | [News] | [Trail of Tears]
[Symposia] | [Other Resources] | [About] | [Links]

© UALR American Native Press Archives 2002-2007

University of Arkansas at Little Rock